From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication |
Date: | 2008-07-22 23:08:51 |
Message-ID: | 1216768131.3894.525.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 01:39 +0300, Marko Kreen wrote:
> On 7/22/08, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > We could represent this with 3 parameters:
> > synchronous_commit = on | off
> > synchronous_standby_transfer = on | off
> > synchronous_standby_wal_fsync = on | off
> >
> > If we are able to define these robustness characteristics for each
> > transaction *separately* then it will represent an industry first: no
> > other database has that capability implemented or planned on published
> > roadmaps, nor has it been discussed in research to my knowledge.
> >
> > Changing the parameter setting at transaction-level would be expensive
> > if we had to set three parameters.
>
> How about extending BEGIN.with additional keywords?
SQL Standard, plus many interfaces hide BEGIN from you.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Decibel! | 2008-07-22 23:09:51 | Re: Postgres-R: tuple serialization |
Previous Message | Marko Kreen | 2008-07-22 22:39:22 | Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication |