Re: BUG #17537: Dynamically updating statement_timeout not affect the insert query right now.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: teng_wang13(at)163(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #17537: Dynamically updating statement_timeout not affect the insert query right now.
Date: 2022-07-03 15:01:20
Message-ID: 1216663.1656860480@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

PG Bug reporting form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> However, dynamically updating statement_timeout did not affect the insert
> query right now.
> I start up Postgres with statement_timeout set 0, which means disabling the
> timeout. Then I insert 100000000 rows into a table, which finally takes
> 166498.487ms. During the insert operation, I consider the operation would
> takes too much time. So I update statement_timeout to 10s in
> postgresql.conf, and "select pg_reload_conf();" in another session to reload
> configuration files.

This is not a bug. Active sessions absorb new values from postgresql.conf
only when idle, not instantaneously mid-query (and I'm pretty sure that is
documented, though I'm too lazy to search the docs right now). I think
trying to do the latter would break far more scenarios than it would
improve.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2022-07-03 15:09:44 Re: BUG #17537: Dynamically updating statement_timeout not affect the insert query right now.
Previous Message PG Bug reporting form 2022-07-03 11:14:03 BUG #17538: Dynamically updating log_hostname not affect the disconnection log