Re: [HACKERS] Userset logging

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: List pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Userset logging
Date: 2008-07-08 07:36:21
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 16:13 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> I notice log_temp_files is a PGC_USERSET parameter, which is out of step
> with our current thinking on who is allowed to initiate logging.
> Is there a rationale for this? Or should we set this to PGC_SUSET like
> all the other logging functions?

Patch enclosed.

Simon Riggs
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support

Attachment Content-Type Size
log_temp_files_suset.v1.patch text/x-patch 924 bytes

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zdenek Kotala 2008-07-08 08:22:32 Re: [WIP] patch - Collation at database level
Previous Message Dave Page 2008-07-08 07:26:42 Re: CommitFest rules

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2008-07-08 09:01:05 Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECURSIVE updated to CVS TIP
Previous Message ITAGAKI Takahiro 2008-07-08 01:29:04 Re: [PATCHES] WIP: executor_hook for pg_stat_statements