Re: PostgreSQL derivatives

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: info(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Seth Grimes <grimes(at)altaplana(dot)com>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL derivatives
Date: 2008-06-13 16:31:31
Message-ID: 1213374691.11470.302.camel@jd-laptop
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 12:19 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:

> > I think you, as a Core member, should answer that question, not me.
>
> My core status isn't relevant, I think.

I would agree, as I recall this isn't in Core's mission at all. The fact
that you are also a major contributor is the status that matters here.

> Oh, you got me. I am going back to hiding in my Death Star now. ;-)
>
> Seriously, I mean "we" as in "we (the community) require all
> contributions to be anonymous", which is what you suggested. I did not
> mean EnterpriseDB.

Why in god's name would we require contributions to be anonymous? That
is silly. However, I don't think we should attribute to companies in
patches, we attribute to people.

>
> I could try to get EnterpriseDB to scale back their contributions, as
> you suggested, but I am not sure I would be successful, and I am not

You could try but then you would be dealing with me on this thread and
not Simon :P. The idea that we should get anyone to scale back is
ridiculous.

>
> (The idea of Denis as Darth Vader really has humor potential.)
>

http://www.commandprompt.com/TUX/07/png/l06-04.png

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2008-06-13 16:56:01 Re: PostgreSQL derivatives
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-06-13 16:19:27 Re: PostgreSQL derivatives