| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | info(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Seth Grimes <grimes(at)altaplana(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL derivatives |
| Date: | 2008-06-13 15:41:21 |
| Message-ID: | 1213371681.11470.271.camel@jd-laptop |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 11:31 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> Ah, yes, this is certainly something we always want to avoid --- having
> one company be so closely associated with Postgres that people think the
> company owns it and therefore controls it.
>
> Is that a problem now? What things can the community or companies do to
> avoid that? We could scale back contributions, but I am afraid that
> will hurt more than help.
I don't see it as a problem in any way at this point, it used to be... 7
years ago. Now there are just too many companies and contributors
involved.
Joshua D. Drake
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-06-13 15:42:50 | Re: PostgreSQL passes MySQL for Freshmeat Downloads |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-06-13 15:37:39 | Re: [Cert] Online or paperwork - results |