Re: ABI Compliance Checker GSoC Project

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Mankirat Singh <mankiratsingh1315(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: ABI Compliance Checker GSoC Project
Date: 2026-01-29 14:18:52
Message-ID: 1213239.1769696332@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> OK, baza is now showing the 1 artifact change that I would expect
> (TransitionCaptureState) [1-4]. That should go away after I push my
> change to .abi-compliance-history.

> However, crake is now showing between 4 and 17 artifacts changes
> [5-8]. Apart from the 1 expected failure, the rest appear to have
> nothing to do with any recent commits.

Yeah. Those look exactly like what I got when I experimentally
installed the headersdir fix without flushing the animal's
cached abidw output for the reference commit, ie they compare
reference-without-headersdir to current-with-headersdir. So
I think this means that Andrew just forgot that step, and it will
go away by itself when you push the .abi-compliance-history
changes (forcing a rebuild of the cached abidw output).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Pyhalov 2026-01-29 14:24:15 Re: Limit memory usage by postgres_fdw batches
Previous Message Anthonin Bonnefoy 2026-01-29 14:10:57 Re: Auto-tune shared_buffers to use available huge pages