Re: New software catalog fails (why are we spelling it "catalogue"?)

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New software catalog fails (why are we spelling it "catalogue"?)
Date: 2008-06-11 18:55:41
Message-ID: 1213210541.1068.6.camel@jd-laptop
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 19:52 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 7:50 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:

> > I couldn't find the swahili so I divert to Russian!
> >
> > каталогизировать
>
> Hmm - is pg_каталогизировать valid? Or does the prefix change the
> meaning in some way?
>
> We have to get these things right y'know...

пг_каталогизировать

Should do it :) Of course their might be the problem with tab complete.

JHoshua D. Drake

>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Raymond O'Donnell 2008-06-11 19:27:23 Re: New software catalog fails (why are we spelling it "catalogue"?)
Previous Message Dave Page 2008-06-11 18:52:10 Re: New software catalog fails (why are we spelling it "catalogue"?)