From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Outer joins and equivalence |
Date: | 2008-06-02 17:10:44 |
Message-ID: | 1212426644.4120.378.camel@ebony.site |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
On Tue, 2008-05-27 at 17:43 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > I have a complex query where making a small change to the SQL increases
> > run-time by > 1000 times.
>
> > The first SQL statement is of the form
>
> > A JOIN B ON (a.id = b.id) LEFT JOIN C ON (a.id = c.id)
>
> > and the second is like this
>
> > A JOIN B ON (a.id = b.id) LEFT JOIN C ON (b.id = c.id)
>
> > the only difference is the substitution of a -> b
>
> Please provide an actual test case.
Getting closer, but still not able to produce a moveable test case.
Symptoms are
* using partitioning
* when none of the partitions are excluded
* when equivalence classes ought to be able to reconcile join
Still working on it
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Webb Sprague | 2008-06-02 17:18:08 | Re: Proposal: new function array_init |
Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2008-06-02 16:47:42 | Re: Overhauling GUCS |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-06-02 19:47:11 | Re: Outer joins and equivalence |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-06-01 09:10:40 | Re: 2GB or not 2GB |