Re: Simplifying unknown-literal handling

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: andrew(at)supernews(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Simplifying unknown-literal handling
Date: 2005-05-29 19:13:58
Message-ID: 12122.1117394038@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew - Supernews <andrew+nonews(at)supernews(dot)com> writes:
> Are there any cases where UNKNOWN can be received from the frontend as
> a binary value? I suspect there are.

Sure, but that's transparent because we have binary I/O converters.
You will have trouble if you try to inject an embedded zero that way,
but the end result will look about the same as when you try to inject
an embedded zero now: the data after the zero will be dropped on readout.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew - Supernews 2005-05-29 20:10:23 Re: Simplifying unknown-literal handling
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-05-29 19:10:32 Re: Escape handling in COPY, strings, psql