Re: Report some potential memory leak bugs in pg_dump.c

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: wliang(at)stu(dot)xidian(dot)edu(dot)cn, pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Report some potential memory leak bugs in pg_dump.c
Date: 2022-02-19 07:04:14
Message-ID: 12081.1645254254@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

"David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 10:59 PM <wliang(at)stu(dot)xidian(dot)edu(dot)cn> wrote:
>> Specifically, at line 10545 and line 10546, function
>> getFormattedTypeName() is called, which allocates a chunk of memory by
>> using pg_strdup() and returns it.

> I'm not a C programmer but am operating under the assumption that you are
> probably incorrect. So I took a cursory look at the code (in HEAD),
> starting with the function comment. It says:
> "* Note that the result is cached and must not be freed by the caller."

There's also this in the body of the function:

/*
* Cache the result for re-use in later requests, if possible. If we
* don't have a TypeInfo for the type, the string will be leaked once the
* caller is done with it ... but that case really should not happen, so
* leaking if it does seems acceptable.
*/

Since getTypes() makes a TypeInfo for every row of pg_type, "really
should not happen" is an accurate statement. You'd pretty much have to
be dealing with a catalog-corruption scenario for the non-cached path
to be taken.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message wliang 2022-02-19 08:04:38 Re all: Report some potential memory leak bugs in pg_dump.c
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2022-02-19 06:15:55 Re: Report some potential memory leak bugs in pg_dump.c