Re: Proposal: improve shutdown during online backup

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal: improve shutdown during online backup
Date: 2008-03-26 20:51:07
Message-ID: 1206564667.4285.1223.camel@ebony.site
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 14:36 +0100, Albe Laurenz wrote:
> I'm referring to the discussion in this thread:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-11/msg00946.php
>
> As expressed in the thread, I think that there should not be
> a backup_label file in the data directory after a clean shutdown,
> because
> a) it's probably an oversight anyway (someone forgot to
> call pg_stop_backup) and
> b) it will force an unnecessary recovery at server restart,
> which will sometimes fail (if the WAL file is no longer there).
>
> This is my proposal:
>
> 1) On "pg_ctl stop|restart -m smart", check if online backup is
> in progress and do not shutdown in this case (treat the online
> backup like an open connection).
> 2) On "pg_ctl stop|restart -m fast", remove backup_label after
> the server has been brought down successfully.
>
> If that's acceptable, I'd be willing to work on it.

Seems reasonable. Go for it.

--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com

PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference: http://www.postgresql.org.uk

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2008-03-26 21:26:41 Re: Surfacing qualifiers
Previous Message Chris Browne 2008-03-26 20:25:58 Re: Sending queries directly