Re: FETCH FIRST

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: FETCH FIRST
Date: 2008-03-25 15:57:59
Message-ID: 1206460679.4285.948.camel@ebony.site
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 11:47 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 10:45 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> Where does this FETCH appear in a SELECT?
>
> > It's supposed to go *after* the OFFSET clause in a query, but making it
> > a simple synonym for LIMIT seems most sensible.
>
> Huh? OFFSET isn't in standard SQL either.

Tis now.

> Are you sure you're not
> confusing FETCH-from-a-cursor with SELECT?

Quite sure.

--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com

PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference: http://www.postgresql.org.uk

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2008-03-25 16:02:25 Re: TRUNCATE TABLE with IDENTITY
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-03-25 15:56:54 Re: HP-UX 11.11 PostgreSQL 8.3.1 - psql core dumps - Unresolved symbol: tgetent