Re: Planning time is high in Postgres 11.5 Compared with Postgres 10.11

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: avinash varma <avinashvarma443(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Planning time is high in Postgres 11.5 Compared with Postgres 10.11
Date: 2019-12-16 16:16:54
Message-ID: 12053.1576513014@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

avinash varma <avinashvarma443(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Actually , we used the same backup to restore on both V10 & V11 , So the
> data on both the versions is same.
> After restore, we ran vacuum full analyze on both the servers .
> default_statistics_target value "1000" is same on both the versions.
> Used the same postgresql.conf , i,e it is same on both V10 and V11

You didn't answer the question:

>> First thing to do is to look into pg_stats and see how large those
>> arrays actually are in each case ...

Also, please don't top-post when replying. It makes it hard for
people to follow the conversation.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jens.Wilke 2019-12-16 18:00:26 Missing locales prevent autovacuum
Previous Message avinash varma 2019-12-16 15:27:20 Re: Planning time is high in Postgres 11.5 Compared with Postgres 10.11