Re: Possible regression setting GUCs on \connect

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Alexander Korotkov <akorotkov(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Possible regression setting GUCs on \connect
Date: 2023-04-27 19:34:55
Message-ID: 1204668.1682624095@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I suspect the problem is that GUCArrayDelete() is using the wrong Datum:

> - newUsersetArray = construct_array_builtin(&d, 1, BOOLOID);
> + newUsersetArray = construct_array_builtin(&userSetDatum, 1, BOOLOID);

Ah, should have checked my mail earlier.

However, my concern about whether we even want this feature
still stands.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2023-04-27 21:25:30 Re: Should vacuum process config file reload more often
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-04-27 19:22:04 Re: Possible regression setting GUCs on \connect