Re: WARNINGs after starting backup server created with PITR

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Erik Jones <erik(at)myemma(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, General postgres mailing list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WARNINGs after starting backup server created with PITR
Date: 2008-01-20 09:16:33
Message-ID: 1200820593.4255.469.camel@ebony.site
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 13:53 -0600, Erik Jones wrote:

> > Is the History table Insert only? We might use that fact to examine
> > the
> > LSNs of the equivalent blocks on the Primary. If the LSNs are prior to
> > the start of the recovery, as noted in the backup label file of the
> > original base backup, then we can confirm rsync or postgres as the
> > cause. Do you still have the base backup label file or base backup?
>
> I still have the backup label but not the base backup. The history
> tables are about 90-95% insert only, on average, but they do see the
> occasional update if a message's delivery status is a bounce. If you
> think this would still be an option, I'd be happy to follow whatever
> instructions, or supply any files, needed.

OK. Off-list, please post me the backup label file and 2-3 compressed
WAL files covering the period where recovery started.

--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2008-01-20 09:19:46 Re: WARNINGs after starting backup server created with PITR
Previous Message Jon Hancock 2008-01-20 08:21:01 SHA1 on postgres 8.3