| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators? |
| Date: | 2020-05-20 22:21:17 |
| Message-ID: | 12005.1590013277@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2020-May-20, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I feel like we'd be better advised to somehow
>> treat can-be-bare-col-label as an independent classification.
> Would it make sense (and possible) to have a keyword category that is
> not disjoint wrt. the others? Maybe that ends up being easier than
> a solution that ends up with six or seven categories.
Yeah, that's the same thing I was vaguely imagining -- an independent
flag on each keyword as to whether it can be used as a bare column
alias.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2020-05-20 22:42:37 | Re: PostgreSQL 13 Beta 1 Release Announcement Draft |
| Previous Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2020-05-20 22:11:08 | Re: PostgreSQL 13 Beta 1 Release Announcement Draft |