Re: BUG #3877: Doc Clarification: archive_command and restore_command replacements

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Kevin Hunt <kevin(at)centropy(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #3877: Doc Clarification: archive_command and restore_command replacements
Date: 2008-01-15 20:11:23
Message-ID: 1200427883.4266.1777.camel@ebony.site
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 14:50 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Kevin Hunt" <kevin(at)centropy(dot)com> writes:
> > The description of %p is misleading since it is replaced with not just the
> > path, but also filename.
>
> Hm? "Path name" includes the file name in all usages I know about.

Agreed.

> > An example showing how the sample commands would be expanded would also
> > help:
>
> That sounds reasonable.

Yep, I'll scan the docs and submit a patch, unless Tom has already.

--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-01-15 20:22:21 Re: BUG #3877: Doc Clarification: archive_command and restore_command replacements
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-01-15 19:50:33 Re: BUG #3877: Doc Clarification: archive_command and restore_command replacements