Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Hannes Dorbath <light(at)theendofthetunnel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4
Date: 2008-01-15 17:27:15
Message-ID: 1200418035.10057.444.camel@dogma.ljc.laika.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 22:10 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> It's a tossup from here. Anybody have a strong opinion one way or the
> other?
>

To me a heapscan means "read all the tuples" (without implying order)
and an ordered heap scan is a special case that should be made explicit.
But this is not a strong opinion.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-01-15 17:30:17 Re: Segmentation fault with 8.3 FTS ISpell
Previous Message Luca Arzeni 2008-01-15 17:19:05 varchar sort ordering ignore blanks

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2008-01-15 19:01:32 Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4
Previous Message Teodor Sigaev 2008-01-15 17:16:26 Re: ts_headline() dumps core