=?iso-8859-1?q?Enrique=20Ariz=F3n?= <e_arizon_benito(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> since flash memory hardware is dropping prices at
> high rate I was planning to test how Postgresql runs
> in such hardware.
This is probably a bad idea, unless the number-of-write-cycles
limitation of flash memory has gone away while I wasn't looking.
PG is pretty piggy as far as rewriting disk pages goes, especially
for the WAL files.
regards, tom lane