From: | Christophe Courtois <christophe(dot)courtois(at)dalibo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Thomas Reiss <thomas(dot)reiss(at)dalibo(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Performance regression with PostgreSQL 11 and partitioning |
Date: | 2018-07-10 06:57:30 |
Message-ID: | 11e9b5a5-6791-eb17-34ca-6e76c0bd3572@dalibo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
Le 09/07/2018 à 22:10, David Rowley a écrit :
> On 10 July 2018 at 00:47, Christophe Courtois
> <christophe(dot)courtois(at)dalibo(dot)com> wrote:
> (Christophe reports 2x performance regression with PG11 when using
> 10000 partitions)
> Thanks for the report. Can you supply your test case when shows this regression?
> Please, can you also post in English for the future.
Sorry, that was supposed to be a private mail to Thomas. I lack time to
reproduce cleanly my tests after the latest patch and dig a bit myself.
Basically I do an inner join between a 10'000 partitions table and
itself with a simple WHERE. I'm not sure that this happens in the real
world.
Yours,
--
Christophe Courtois
Consultant Dalibo
http://dalibo.com/ - http://dalibo.org/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jamison, Kirk | 2018-07-10 07:05:12 | Recovery performance of standby for multiple concurrent truncates on large tables |
Previous Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2018-07-10 06:49:12 | Re: Let's remove DSM_IMPL_NONE. |