Re: check with serial

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Vaishnavi Prabakaran <vaishnaviprabakaran(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: check with serial
Date: 2017-05-03 14:31:11
Message-ID: 11ae99b5-63e8-9c77-cef2-d7fa69f76d18@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 05/03/2017 10:12 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> On 05/02/2017 10:13 PM, Vaishnavi Prabakaran wrote:
>>> And, now after your patch, do we still need "installcheck-parallel"
>>> command? It is redundant IMO, just give a thought.
>> I'd be quite happy to remove the target in favor of this more general
>> solution.
> -1 --- that will break a lot of existing habits to no purpose, not to
> mention creating complications for scripts used to test multiple branches.
> We have intentionally maintained backwards compatibility in these testing
> targets for a very long time, even though that's left us with
> inconsistencies like installcheck defaulting to serial while check
> defaults to parallel. Adding a new capability is not an excuse for
> breaking the historical test targets.
>
>

OK

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2017-05-03 14:31:58 Re: CTE inlining
Previous Message Claudio Freire 2017-05-03 14:26:27 Re: CTE inlining