AW: CommitDelay performance improvement

From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
To: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: AW: CommitDelay performance improvement
Date: 2001-02-26 17:50:09
Message-ID: 11C1E6749A55D411A9670001FA687963368218@sdexcsrv1.f000.d0188.sd.spardat.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


One thing that I remember from a performance test we once did is, that the results
are a lot more realistic, better and more stable, if you try to decouple the startup of
the different clients a little bit, so they are not all in the same section of code at the same time.

We inserted random usleeps, I forgot what range, but 10 ms seem reasonable to me.

This was another database, but it might also apply here.

Andreas

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Schindler 2001-02-26 18:29:02 stuck spinlock
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-02-26 17:25:16 Re: AW: Release in 2 weeks ...