Re: Experiences with extensibility

From: Martin <martin(at)cornhobble(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Experiences with extensibility
Date: 2008-01-09 20:51:36
Message-ID: 1199911896.86773@no.spam
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

In article <92404875-3F83-43A2-B9B1-88C662A077FD(at)event-s(dot)net>,
Guido Neitzer <lists(at)event-s(dot)net> wrote:

>FrontBase. It has an incredibly easy to configure replication and
>multi master clustering support, is very reliable and can also handle
>really big databases.

I've been working with FrontBase a lot lately and I wouldn't say
anything about it qualifies as "incredibly easy" and reliable it
is not. Performance of FrontBase is just plain terrible. One of
our reports takes 9 minutes on FrontBase and 10 seconds on
Postgres.

Then there's the documentation issue...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zoltan Boszormenyi 2008-01-09 21:13:35 Re: count(*) and bad design was: Experiences with extensibility
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2008-01-09 20:48:39 Re: Experiences with extensibility