Re: Some ideas about Vacuum

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>, Gokulakannan Somasundaram <gokul007(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Some ideas about Vacuum
Date: 2008-01-09 16:24:50
Message-ID: 1199895890.4266.371.camel@ebony.site
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 15:10 +0000, Gregory Stark wrote:

> The goal should be to improve vacuum, then
> adjust the autovacuum_scale_factor as low as we can. As vacuum gets
> cheaper the scale factor can go lower and lower. We shouldn't allow
> the existing autovacuum behaviour to control the way vacuum works.

Very much agreed.

--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Markus Schiltknecht 2008-01-09 16:30:43 Re: Named vs Unnamed Partitions
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-01-09 16:21:17 Re: Named vs Unnamed Partitions