Re: Regarding identifying a foreign scan

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Regarding identifying a foreign scan
Date: 2012-10-07 15:29:49
Message-ID: 11952.1349623789@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Does that mean that using (some) global storage is the cause of the problem?

If you're using global storage for state that needs to be replicated
per-scan, yes, probably. But it's hard to be sure when you're being
so vague about what you're doing.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2012-10-07 15:33:38 windows warnings
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-10-07 15:25:50 Re: plpgsql_check_function - rebase for 9.3