| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: psql: Add command to use extended query protocol |
| Date: | 2022-10-28 13:35:55 |
| Message-ID: | 1194941.1666964155@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 08:52:51AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Two, for testing the extended query protocol from psql. For example, for
>> the dynamic result sets patch [1], I have several ad-hoc libpq test programs
>> lying around, which would be cumbersome to integrate into the patch. With
>> psql support like proposed here, it would be very easy to integrate a few
>> equivalent tests.
> +1. As far as I recall, we now have only ECPG to rely on when it
> comes to coverage of the extended query protocol, but even that has
> its limits. (Haven't looked at the patch)
pgbench can be used too, but we lack any infrastructure for using it
in the regression tests. Something in psql could be a lot more
helpful. (I've not studied the patch either.)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Frédéric Yhuel | 2022-10-28 14:07:20 | Re: Transparent column encryption |
| Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2022-10-28 13:27:46 | Re: psql: Add command to use extended query protocol |