| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Simplifying Text Search |
| Date: | 2007-11-12 20:47:56 |
| Message-ID: | 1194900476.2644.226.camel@ebony.site |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2007-11-12 at 20:17 +0000, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Granted, @@ is a bit awkward until you get used to it. "x LIKE y" would
> read out better, but unfortunately that's already taken ;-).
Remember, I'm not suggesting we get rid of @@
> In any case, it's way too late.
I'm suggesting we add a couple of simple SQL functions that will help
text search docs be more easily understood.
It's beta and its valid to respond to usability issues just as we would
respond to code bugs. Otherwise, why have beta? Late, but not too late.
SQLServer, Oracle and MySQL all use functions, not operators. My
observation would be that we have the hardest and most difficult to
understand full text search capability. The Contains() function seems
like a better name than I gave earlier also.
I love what we've done; I just want more people be able to use it.
--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2007-11-12 20:59:17 | Re: Simplifying Text Search |
| Previous Message | Aidan Van Dyk | 2007-11-12 20:44:18 | Re: Simplifying Text Search |