On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 10:18 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > After I have installed these, everything now works perfectly.
> Interesting. We don't do any C++ stuff, so I would hope that the
> first two of those are irrelevant.
> redhat-rpm-config, however, might well be relevant. I remember Devrim
> running into an odd build failure on a machine where it wasn't
Yes. All Fedora clones that are < 7 (CentOS 4,5 , RHEL 4,5 and Fedora
<=6) have this problem.
I have filed a bug report against this, and here is the reply (and bug
This is definitely a bug, but since this package is a must for building
packages (see below), there is nothing we can do.
> I wonder if it'd be worth explicitly BuildRequire'ing
> redhat-rpm-config in the PGDG SRPM? I don't feel the need to do it in
> Fedora/RHEL, because as mentioned there's an explicit policy not to
> for those projects. But it seems the PGDG RPMs get rebuilt in a
> rather wider variety of environments.
I did not add it since redhat-rpm-config is a must per:
(Of course I don't have to stick to Fedora guidelines for PGDG RPMs, but
But we can mention about that in README, etc.
Devrim GÜNDÜZ , RHCE
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, ODBCng - http://www.commandprompt.com/
In response to
pgsql-ports by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2007-11-11 21:55:13|
|Subject: Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Antw: Re: 8.3beta2 fails to compile on Centos5 x86_64 |
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2007-11-11 15:18:50|
|Subject: Re: Antw: Re: 8.3beta2 fails to compile on Centos5 x86_64 |