Re: "bad key in cancel request"

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: "bad key in cancel request"
Date: 2007-11-05 00:03:38
Message-ID: 1194221018.9352.16.camel@goldbach
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 2007-11-04 at 11:06 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> No, if it's intended for the log it should be LOG. Your other proposals
> are actually *less* likely to get to where the DBA could see them.

Good point. I suggested WARNING because that suggests that something is
awry, whereas LOG is used for routine log messages.

I've changed the messages from DEBUG2 to LOG in CVS HEAD -- I didn't
backport the change, but I can if anyone feels strongly about it.

-Neil

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message D'Arcy J.M. Cain 2007-11-05 00:44:44 Re: type money causes unrestorable dump
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-11-04 22:32:48 Re: [HACKERS] quote_literal with NULL