Re: xlogdump

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: xlogdump
Date: 2007-11-04 09:13:25
Message-ID: 1194167605.4258.33.camel@ebony.site
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 10:54 +0000, Gregory Stark wrote:

> Incidentally I would like to call xlog.c:RecordIsValid() which is currently a
> static function. Any objection to exporting it? It doesn't depend on any
> external xlog.c state.

You'll have some fun with that because most of the stuff in xlog.c
depends upon module-level state.

We should change that, but I'd like to see Florian's code go in first
then refactor things.

If you change those programs too much we'll need completely separate
programs for each release, which might be a bad thing.

--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

  • xlogdump at 2007-11-02 10:54:45 from Gregory Stark

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2007-11-04 09:22:25 Re: Proposal: Select ... AS OF Savepoint
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2007-11-04 09:05:27 Re: Asynchronous commit documentation gap