From: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <Josh(dot)Berkus(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
Cc: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Proposal: real procedures again (8.4) |
Date: | 2007-10-27 21:05:26 |
Message-ID: | 1193519126.18398.17.camel@hannu-laptop |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Ühel kenal päeval, L, 2007-10-27 kell 12:55, kirjutas Josh Berkus:
> Merlin, Pavel,
>
> > Mutable session variables would be nice, but I'll take a plpgsql
> > langauge (or psm) with or without them, so long as transactions are
> > manual. It's possible to emulate variables using scalar functions
> > with the desired volatility currently (but you still have to be
> > careful with transactions).
>
> The other big useful feature we're missing from Functions is multisets.
I think that support for multisets has been removed from our fe-be
protocol implementation bit-by-bit.
---------
Hannu
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Fetter | 2007-10-27 21:10:21 | Re: Proposal: real procedures again (8.4) |
Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2007-10-27 20:22:10 | Re: Proposal: real procedures again (8.4) |