From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | jim(at)buttafuoco(dot)net |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 7.2beta3 on Digital Alpha |
Date: | 2001-11-30 23:26:59 |
Message-ID: | 11930.1007162819@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Jim Buttafuoco" <jim(at)buttafuoco(dot)net> writes:
> my error, the workstation I was compiling on had max_proc_per_user set
> to 64.
Ah-hah. We probably ought to document that as a possible source of
failure in the parallel regression tests. I think the present script
will start as many as 20 parallel tests, which means 60 parallel
processes under your userid (a backend, a psql, and probably an owning
shell process for each psql). Add in the postmaster, your own shell,
a couple random make subprocesses, and you got trouble.
> Changed to 1024 and now just float8 and random fail. It looks
> like these errors are ok
You should find that random fails only, um, randomly. If it fails
every time then there's a problem.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2001-12-01 00:01:21 | Re: Second call for platform testing |
Previous Message | Jim Buttafuoco | 2001-11-30 23:20:22 | Re: 7.2beta3 on Digital Alpha |