| From: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
| Date: | 2007-10-10 22:48:14 |
| Message-ID: | 1192056494.8959.60.camel@hannu-laptop |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Ühel kenal päeval, K, 2007-10-10 kell 17:17, kirjutas Tom Lane:
> "Marko Kreen" <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Could you describe bit more? The is_visible_txid() works
> > on data returned by txid_current_snapshot()? How can there
> > be any subtrans id's if txid_current_snapshot() wont return
> > them?
>
> Ah, I see: txid_current() never reports a subxact ID so there's no need to
> consider them elsewhere in txids either. OK, but this desperately needs
> to be documented.
>
> BTW, I notice that use of txid_current will force assignment of an XID
> in a transaction that might not otherwise have one. Does this matter,
> or is the expectation that it's only going to be used in transactions
> that are making DB modifications anyway?
yes, the common use in Skytools (and now in Slony) is in
insert/update/delete triggers to add current txid to log records.
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-10-10 23:22:38 | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
| Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2007-10-10 22:43:16 | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-10-10 23:22:38 | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
| Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2007-10-10 22:43:16 | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |