| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: GUC variable renaming, redux |
| Date: | 2007-09-25 09:34:47 |
| Message-ID: | 1190712887.4181.344.camel@ebony.site |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 10:15 +0200, Csaba Nagy wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 10:55 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > IMO, monitor_ seems weird versus track_. To me monitor implies actions
> > to be taken when thresholds are met. PostgreSQL doesn't do that.
> > PostgreSQL tracks/stores information for application to monitor or
> > interact with and those application may doing something based on the
> > tracked information.
>
> Not that my opinion would count too much on hackers, but "track" sounds
> better to me too, seems more to the point, not to mention it's shorter
> too.
>
> +1 "track"
track_* wins the vote, so no change to committed code.
It's much easier when there's a clear majority, no need for further
debate that way.
--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-09-25 09:38:00 | Re: Suggestion for MSVC build |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-09-25 09:29:24 | Re: [HACKERS] Full page writes improvement, code update |