| From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Josh Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_standby observation |
| Date: | 2007-09-16 18:18:13 |
| Message-ID: | 1189966693.5924.123.camel@jdavis |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sun, 2007-09-16 at 09:25 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> Well, the definition of it working correctly is that a "restored log
> file..." message occurs. Even with archive_timeout set there could be
> various delays before that happens. We have two servers and a network
> involved, so the time might spike occasionally.
>
The problem is, a "restored log file message" might appear in a
different language or with a different prefix, depending on the
settings. That makes it hard to come up with a general solution, so
everyone has to use their own scripts that work with their logging
configuration.
In my particular case, I want to know if those logs aren't being
replayed, regardless of whether it's a network problem or a postgres
problem.
It would be nice if there was a more standardized way to see when
postgres replays a log successfully.
> Touching a file doesn't really prove its working either.
>
Right. It's the best I have now, however, and should detect "most" error
conditions.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Paul Boddie | 2007-09-16 21:28:40 | Re: Database reverse engineering |
| Previous Message | Phoenix Kiula | 2007-09-16 12:09:21 | Re: Statistics collection question |