| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Florian Pflug <fgp(dot)phlo(dot)org(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: HOT patch - version 15 |
| Date: | 2007-09-11 21:30:40 |
| Message-ID: | 1189546240.4281.529.camel@ebony.site |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 16:10 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 09:21 +0530, Pavan Deolasee wrote:
> >> IMHO we are making full circles here. We have already tried LP_DELETE
> >> techniques and moved away to simplify things.
>
> >> We can save rest of the techniques for beta testing period or 8.4.
>
> > Agreed, we're just fine tuning by reinventing old ideas. HOT works, but
> > everybody has their own opinion of which subtle factors are important.
> > Seems like time to find out in Beta.
>
> I am worried by this idea that it's fine to make major changes in HOT
> after beta starts, or that the attentions of beta testers will allow us
> to collect data on variant implementations. Neither is the case.
Understood.
--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-09-12 00:20:45 | Re: HOT documentation README |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-09-11 20:12:54 | Re: invalidly encoded strings |