Re: Use %u to print user mapping's umid and userid

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Use %u to print user mapping's umid and userid
Date: 2016-08-19 20:21:34
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> On 2016/05/13 3:53, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> Regardless of what approach we take, I disagree that this needs to be
>>> fixed in 9.6.

>> Agreed. This is only a cosmetic issue, and it's only going to be visible
>> to a very small group of people, so we can leave it alone until 9.7.

> Agreed.

This thread is shown as "Needs review" in the 2016-09 commitfest, but so
far as I can find, no new patch has been posted since Robert proposed that
we ought to get rid of the current List format for the extra info in favor
of using ExtensibleNode. I'm going to mark the CF entry as Returned With

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-08-19 20:50:01 Re: standalone backend PANICs during recovery
Previous Message Ryan Murphy 2016-08-19 19:39:58 Re: Patch: initdb: "'" for QUOTE_PATH (non-windows)