Re: Remove lossy-operator RECHECK flag?

From: "Teodor Sigaev" <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
To: "Thttps://mail(dot)sigaev(dot)ru/src/webmail(dot)phpom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Teodor Sigaev" <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Remove lossy-operator RECHECK flag?
Date: 2008-04-11 19:38:01
Message-ID: 1189.83.237.62.101.1207942681.squirrel@mail.sigaev.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

> I'm leaning towards removing RECHECK because it'll allow simplification
I vote to do it.

> I seem to recall that you had some plans for other incompatible changes
> in the call conventions for GIST/GIN support functions, too. If
Right now we suggest only new feature which just extent interface. Gregory
suggested to split compare method to two methods and I'm intending to do
it.

--
Teodor Sigaev Email: teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-04-11 19:38:30 Re: Maintaining cluster order on insert
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2008-04-11 19:36:34 Re: Commit fest status

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2008-04-11 19:38:30 Re: Maintaining cluster order on insert
Previous Message Andrew Chernow 2008-04-11 19:24:29 Re: libpq Win32 Mutex performance patch