Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification
Date: 2016-03-07 06:25:12
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> writes:
> In summary, I think it's surprising that a max_parallel_degree of 1
> doesn't disable parallel workers entirely.

Yeah, it's not exactly clear what "1" should mean that's different
from "0", in this case.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tsunakawa, Takayuki 2016-03-07 06:30:47 Re: How can we expand PostgreSQL ecosystem?
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2016-03-07 06:22:19 Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification