Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Machine available for community use

From: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)CommandPrompt(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)CommandPrompt(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Gavin M(dot) Roy" <gmr(at)myyearbook(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Machine available for community use
Date: 2007-07-31 02:25:14
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 19:14 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > and RHEL performed much better than CentOS. 
> Not to be unkind, but I doubt that on an identical configuration.

Since I don't have the permission to distribute the benchmark results, I
will be happy to spend time for re-running these tests if someone
provides me an identical machine. 

Each test took 1-2 days -- I will insist that CentOS performs poorer
than RHEL.

BTW, I will ask for permission to distribute the graphs that I produced
using gnuplot -- Maybe those graphs will give us some light.

PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, ODBCng -

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2007-07-31 02:37:32
Subject: Re: default_text_search_config and expression indexes
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2007-07-31 02:14:21
Subject: Re: Machine available for community use

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group