| From: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 2PC-induced lockup |
| Date: | 2007-07-12 08:19:09 |
| Message-ID: | 1184228349.4316.77.camel@ebony.site |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 18:09 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > There seems like a number of ways that unresolved prepared transactions
> > can cause problems. We really need to have startup mention how many
> > prepared transactions there are, so we have some chance of understanding
> > and resolving potential problems.
>
> While I have no particular objection to such a log entry, I doubt it
> will fix anything; how many people will really think to look in the
> postmaster log?
Even if it were just you and me. From my perspective, thats enough.
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-07-12 08:57:40 | Re: [GENERAL] Count(*) throws error |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-07-12 07:53:16 | Re: [GENERAL] Count(*) throws error |