| From: | Brad Nicholson <bnichols(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Vaccum Stalling |
| Date: | 2007-07-10 15:56:39 |
| Message-ID: | 1184083000.5455.12.camel@bnicholson-desktop |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 11:31 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Brad Nicholson <bnichols(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info> writes:
> > On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 11:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Oh, I forgot to mention --- you did check that vacuum_mem is set to
> >> a pretty high value, no? Else you might be doing a lot more
> >> btbulkdelete scans than you need to.
>
> > What would you define as high for 7.4? I bumped it up to ~ 245mbs
>
> That sounds like plenty --- you only need 6 bytes per dead tuple,
> so that should be enough to handle all your 15-20M dead tuples in
> one scan.
>
> How big is this index again?
Not sure which one it's working on - there are 6 of them each are ~
2.5GB
--
Brad Nicholson 416-673-4106
Database Administrator, Afilias Canada Corp.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-07-10 16:12:24 | Re: Vaccum Stalling |
| Previous Message | Nik | 2007-07-10 15:34:25 | Limit connections per username |