Re: tsearch2: language or encoding

From: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "Tatsuo Ishii" <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: tsearch2: language or encoding
Date: 2007-07-06 10:23:43
Message-ID: 1183717423.4488.12.camel@ebony.site
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 15:43 +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:

> I'm wondering if a tsearch's configuration is bound to a language or
> an encoding. If it's bound to a language, there's a serious design
> problem, I would think. An encoding or charset is not necessarily
> bound to single language. We can find such that example everywhere(I'm
> not talking about Unicode here). LATIN1 inclues English and several
> european languages. EUC-JP includes English and Japanese etc. And
> we specify encoding for char's property, not language, I would say the
> configuration should be bound to an encoding.

Perhaps the encoding could suggest a default language, but I see no
direct connection in many cases between language and encoding,
especially for European languages and encodings.

--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2007-07-06 10:30:39 Re: Bgwriter strategies
Previous Message Greg Smith 2007-07-06 10:08:57 Re: Bgwriter strategies