Re: Fault Tolerant Postgresql (two machines, two postmasters, one disk array)

From: yyyc186 <yyyc186(at)hughes(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fault Tolerant Postgresql (two machines, two postmasters, one disk array)
Date: 2007-06-13 18:09:45
Message-ID: 1181758185.903616.34980@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On May 11, 12:08 pm, j(dot)(dot)(dot)(at)commandprompt(dot)com ("Joshua D. Drake") wrote:
> Geoffrey wrote:
>
> People still use OpenVMS? ... elitist isn't the word I would choose ;)
>

Not only do they use it, new books get written about doing application
development with it. It is still the only OS able to create a fault
tolerant world-wide cluster with complete transaction management
across all nodes. Not just database transactions, but file level and
message queue all integrated with one transaction manager.

Take a look at http://www.theminimumyouneedtoknow.com for information
about "The Minimum You Need to Know to Be an OpenVMS Application
Developer"

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-06-13 18:23:04 Re: how to speed up query
Previous Message Ben 2007-06-13 18:06:39 changing the /tmp/ lock file?