| From: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)tocr(dot)com>, "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, "Postgresql-Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] GSoC Work on readonly queries done so far |
| Date: | 2007-06-06 21:41:18 |
| Message-ID: | 1181166078.26886.121.camel@silverbirch.site |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 17:14 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 12:17 -0400, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
> > > Florian G. Pflug wrote:
> > > > Work done so far:
> > > > -----------------
> > > > .) Don't start autovacuum and bgwriter.
> > >
> > > Do table stats used by the planner get replicated on a PITR slave? I
> > > assume so, but if not, you would need autovac to do analyzes.
> >
> > The replication is an exact block-level replication of the master. We
> > can't write very much at all on the slave.
>
> Hmm, something to keep in mind is forcing cache invals when the master
> causes them (for example relation cache, catalog caches and plan
> caches).
Many things will need to work radically differently.
Best we think of this as Research rather than Development.
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Matthew T. O'Connor | 2007-06-06 22:53:06 | Re: [RFC] GSoC Work on readonly queries done so far |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-06-06 21:36:22 | Re: [RFC] GSoC Work on readonly queries done so far |