Re: Slightly OT.

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Alexander Staubo <alex(at)purefiction(dot)net>
Cc: "gonzales(at)linuxlouis(dot)net" <gonzales(at)linuxlouis(dot)net>, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, Kenneth Downs <ken(at)secdat(dot)com>, nikolay(at)samokhvalov(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Slightly OT.
Date: 2007-06-01 18:14:22
Message-ID: 1180721662.26915.258.camel@dogma.v10.wvs
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, 2007-06-01 at 17:00 +0200, Alexander Staubo wrote:
> the projected Slony-II design, but the setup seems dead simple, and
> from the docs I have found it seems to transparently replicate schema
> changes, unlike Slony-I. So that's something.
>

To be fair to Slony-I, the fact that it does not replicate DDL is a
feature, not a bug. It's table-based, which is a very flexible design.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rick Schumeyer 2007-06-01 18:27:47 Multiple customers sharing one database?
Previous Message Mike Ginsburg 2007-06-01 18:00:10 Re: Interval Rounding