| From: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Postmaster startup messages |
| Date: | 2007-06-01 08:57:16 |
| Message-ID: | 1180688237.26297.66.camel@silverbirch.site |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2007-06-01 at 10:33 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Freitag, 1. Juni 2007 10:06 schrieb Simon Riggs:
> > Recovery considerations mean there can be more than one copy of a
> > database and it is important to be able to tell which one was just
> > started. The time a database was shutdown defines which copy we are
> > looking at.
>
> No, the database identifier defines that.
No, it doesn't.
As I said, there can be more than one copy of the *same* database.
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-06-01 11:02:34 | Re: Attempt to re-archive existing WAL logs afterrestoring from backup |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-06-01 08:55:10 | Re: 'Waiting on lock' |