From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: generalizing the planner knobs |
Date: | 2005-12-01 16:49:42 |
Message-ID: | 11805.1133455782@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> ... ISTM that a simple improvement to what we have now
> would allow for a wider range of planner hints with only minor changes:
> we could replace the enable_XXX variables with a set of variables that
> would add an arbitrary constant to the estimated cost of each type of
> query node. (Alternatively, an arbitrary multiplier could be specified;
> I'm not sure which would be better.)
I think the multiplier would be better, because it'd avoid the problem
you mention later that useful values would be dependent on the planner's
cost units. Also, one could sanely allow a multiplier less than one,
so as to favor instead of penalize a particular plan type.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-12-01 17:00:59 | Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases |
Previous Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2005-12-01 15:55:40 | Re: generalizing the planner knobs |