| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrey Lepikhov <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Increase value of OUTER_VAR |
| Date: | 2021-03-03 15:06:03 |
| Message-ID: | 1180484.1614783963@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Also, I got reminded of this discussion from not so long ago:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/16302-e45634e2c0e34e97%40postgresql.org
Yeah. Nobody seems to have pursued Peter's idea of changing the magic
values to small negative ones, but that seems like a nicer idea than
arguing over what large positive value is large enough.
(Having said that, I remain pretty dubious that we're anywhere near
getting any real-world use out of such a change.)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2021-03-03 15:18:39 | Re: Fix DROP TABLESPACE on Windows with ProcSignalBarrier? |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2021-03-03 15:00:35 | Re: Huge memory consumption on partitioned table with FKs |