Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines
Date: 2003-09-12 15:43:35
Message-ID: 11788.1063381415@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> OK, here is an Opteron/Itanium patch that might work.

[having now read both patches]

Assuming that this covers the issues (what other OSes might run on
64-bit machines within 7.4's lifespan?) I think there is little question
that this is the more conservative patch to use for 7.4. I like your
larger cleanup, but for 7.5.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2003-09-12 15:44:08 Re: massive quotes?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-12 15:41:04 Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-12 15:45:04 Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-12 15:41:04 Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines